Category Archives: Middle East

Syria gets worse

Earlier this week the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, released a report that around 5,000 people had died in Syria do far. As government repression increases the armed rebel movement in Syria is fighting back harder and harder. Today, Reuters reported that 27 Syrian soldiers we’re killed by rebels; and Human Rights Watch released a report identifying 74 Syrian commanders who either ordered, authorized, or condoned killings and torture of civilians. The HRW report recommends that the Syrian regime be brought to the ICC for war crimes.

So is 5,000 dead enough to go to the ICC? Ratko Mladic is currently on trial in the The Hague for his alleged ordering of the massacre of 8,000 Bosnian Muslims during the tail end of the war in Yugoslavia. At the rate the Syrian regime is killing its citizens it is only a matter of time before 5,000 becomes 8,000 or 10,000. The simple answer is yes, 5,000 deaths is enough; any state sponsored killing is enough to warrant cause for alarm and reason for criminal prosecution. It would also send a clear message to other autocratic leaders. The problem is in capturing and trying Assad. When Muammar Gaddafi was indicted it only made him more dedicated to crushing the rebellion in Libya. Assad still retains popularity in the country, and would be able to use the security forces as well as the fear of religious unrest to foment more violence. If he was not already a war criminal an ICC indictment would solidify it. The ultimate fear would be civil war, which seems increasingly likely.

There are some bright spots on the horizon though. Russian UN envoy Vitaly Churkin said that the BRICS nations are willing to deploy monitors; and the opposition is beginning to make progress. Only the Syrian people can determine the Syrian future.

Mission Acomplished?

20111215-104331.jpg

It has taken nearly nine years, but the war in Iraq is officially over. But is this mission accomplished?

With close to 5,000 service men killed, 30,000 wounded, and over 100,000 Iraqi’s killed the obvious answer is no. America has succeeded in overthrowing a dictator and helping to develop one of the most corrupt nations in the world. The toppling of Saddam has empowered Iran, and further divided the nation along ethnic and religious lines. The ends does not justify the means. The Arab Spring speaks volumes to the fact that people can bring about change. We are too quick to use military intervention to solve problems. In the coming months I am sure that we will hear more about all the wonderful things that the Iraq war has accomplished; don’t buy into the spin. With thousands of security contractors, and the biggest U.S. embassy ever, we are far from leaving Mesopotamia or accomplishing anything of substance. The idea that the Iraqi people are going to rule their own country is also a fallacy. America is now forever linked to Iraq. Iraqi PM Maliki will be propped up for as long as it is possible. Noes he’s “our guy” in the region.
The most disconcerting aspect of this Middle East debacle is the Presidents lack of acknowledgement of how futile and wrong the war was. This same president said that it was a stupid war, but now talks about the wonderful democracy that we have brought to the Iraqis. Afraid to criticize the military that he now wholeheartedly loves, the president has let down many of his original supporters. What happened to the notion of supporting the troops
but not the war? We are not safer or better off now that Saddam is gone. Obviously those who shed blood and died in Iraq should not be forgotten. They were sent to nation to fight a war that served no purpose, and made no one safer. On the other hand we can’t just roll over and declare success.
Iraq is more dangerous and corrupt than ever before. We are not really leaving the country, instead just minimizing the foot print. Also don’t forget that we are still fighting in Afghanistan. And don’t forget that it is ok to be critical of a war. There is nothing wrong with saying we messed up.

Chance of war with Iran? Slim to none

With so much rhetoric about Iran and the possibility of war, I thought that I would share this recent episode of Empire.  Everyone advocating for some form of military action should take a deep breath, sit down, and watch this.

Israel keeps changing the discussion

Politicos Ben Smith has caused a small but significant stir in the ranks of the Democratic party a few days ago when he wrote a piece examining the divide over Israel with in the party.  In the article Smith describes a battle between a majority of Democrats, who defend and praise Israel almost unconditionally, with the small but very vocal minority of those on the left speaking out against the hypocrisy and destructive nature of the state of Israel.  He points to several prominent bloggers at the Center for American Progress’ Middle East blog, as well as M.J. Rosenberg of Media Matters, both organizations are very well known as staunchly Democratic institutions.

The next day an article by Salon.com shows that after the Politico article was published, Josh Block the former AIPAC spokesman, sent out an email to a private listserv named the “Freedom Community“.  This group consisted of many conservative journalists.  The main aim espoused by Block in the email was that everyone should more a less expose those critical of Israel for what they are, anti-Semitic.  Those at CAP and Media Matters expressing these kind of ideas are way outside the mainstream for Block.  In one section of the email he writes that

“This kind of anti-Israel sentiment is so fringe it’s support by CAP is outrageous, but at least it is out in the open now — as is their goal – clearly applauded by revolting allies like the pro-HAMAS and anti-Zionist/One State Solution advocate Ali Abunumiah and those who accuse pro-Israel Americans of having ‘dual loyalties’ or being ‘Israel-Firsters’ – to shape the minds of future generations of Democrats,”… “These are the words of anti-Semites, not Democratic political players.”

Block feels as if it is their duty to right this terrible and dangerous injustice that faces all Jews and their allies.

In today’s New York Times the Anti-Defamation League had a huge add displaying a young boy talking all about the evils of anti-Semitic bullying; while Brian Leher talked to Israeli activist Itamar Marcus, who spent most of the interview basically stating that Palestinians, and the PA in particular, love terrorists and are involved in a massive media coup to distort the truth.  The obvious fact that there is enough propaganda to go around, especially in the way Israeli media both operates and reports seems to have been lost on the guest.

All of this happening in  the past few days points to one of Israel’s oldest tricks to dodge more important issues and to justify their aggressive actions; that of the ever pervasive violent antisemitism that is still going on through out the world.  I am not going to sit here and say that there is no antisemitism in the world. It most certainly exists and is as dangerous as any other form a prejudice.  But, the notion that it is growing or that it is a somehow a major threat to the security of the state of Israel or Jews here in the United States is outrageous.  Here in America the Jewish vote which only makes up about 2% of the electorate, is one of the most fought over constituencies in a presidential election.  At the recent Republican Jewish Coalition forum nearly every GOP candidate tried to out do one another with rhetoric about their commitment to Israel.  Most of the candidates promised to move the embassy as well as preached about the dangers of Iran and “radical Islam”.  If there is any form of “anti” anything it would be a general mood of anti-Islam, anti-Arab, and anti-Palestinian now widely accepted in mainstream politics.  It is safe to say that while there is some antisemitism, it poses no real threat.

And yet we still haven’t answered what all this hubbub is about.  Just a few months ago PA president Abu Mazen gave an extremely well received speech in the U.N. declaring his intentions to gain full status as a nation.  Most experts deemed that it was probably doomed to failure, while all the same it was a step, if all be it a small one, in a different direction.  This in large part put PM Netanyahu on the defensive.  For once he might actually have to do something more than rail against the Palestinians and the awful Muslim extremists. Instead, Bibi Netenyahu has doubled efforts to build more illegal settlements in Palestine.  The tit for tat rockets attacks have begun to start  up again between Gaza and the IDF.  At least 4 people were killed today in Gaza, including a 12 year boy, after Israeli airstrikes.  And the rhetoric against Iran has now reached a fever pitch.  All of this distracts everyone from the real existential threat to the Jewish state, and that is the lack of a real functioning Palestine.  Rather than actually work with the Palestinians and make inroads in solving the issue, Israel turns the argument on its head, claiming that Iran wants to destroy the Jewish state.  There is no time to even think about the Palestinian question, because Iran wants to kill all the Jews.  This in conjunction with their cronies the ADL and AIPAC; spewing nonsense about the rise of antisemitism, are able to change the discussion entirely.  There is no more room to discuss anything related to Palestine.  Once again a people who have suffered decades of oppression are relegated to the back benches.

Smiths article makes the point of stating that there is now an actual change going on within Democratic circles about a need to change their stance on the question of Palestine.  So perhaps there is some hope in an other wise extremely gloomy situation for the oppressed Palestinians.