Corbett Report Interview 989 Pearse Redmond Peels the TOR Onion

From Corbett Report:

“The TOR Project promises its users a modicum of privacy protection from would-be information gatherers, both small time crooks and nation-state cyber-security agencies. But do these promises hold up to scrutiny? And who is behind the TOR Project itself? And why did a TOR developer recently doxx a critic on Twitter? Joining us today to dissect this onion stew is Pearse Redmond of Porkins Policy Review.”

Download Corbett Report Interview 989

Show Notes From The Corbett Report:

Tor Project Overview

Tor, CSpace And ZRTP Are Your Passport To Anonymity

Porkins Policy Radio episode 26 Peeling the onion behind Tor, EFF, and John Perry Barlow

Almost everyone involved in developing Tor was (or is) funded by the US government

EFF Becomes Omidyar Network Partner

Snowden’s First Move Against the NSA Was a Party in Hawaii

High-Traffic Colluding Tor Routers in Washington, D.C., and the Ugly Truth About Online Anonymity

Embassy leaks highlight pitfalls of Tor

How the NSA got to anonymized Tor users

‘Spoiled Onions’ in the Tor Network, Researchers Find

Has Tor been bugged by the NSA?

TOR: “Solidarity against online harassment”

Taxpayer-Funded Privacy Advocates, Liberal Pundits, and Nazi-Rapist-Snitch Allies Make Case for Doxxing Critics. You Are Literally Next.

Shit I Never Tweeted: A Heretic’s Lament

Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • browngroupllc  On January 13, 2015 at 11:23 am

    Reblogged this on ClearNFO and commented:
    Some Great NFO on T0r …

  • browngroupllc  On January 13, 2015 at 11:26 am

    As usual, a great job on this topic. Thanks!

  • John  On January 13, 2015 at 10:03 pm

    While there are numerous questions about TOR there is a clear suggestion that the designers knew the obvious weakness, considering the number of people involved, and left this weakness as a hole only they could exploit. This is detailed in my article “Are TOR holes intentional?” (http://distinctivist.com/Article-2015-01-13).

  • Roman Scandle  On January 22, 2015 at 6:50 pm

    Hey Pearse. I don’t agree with your conclusion that Tor is best avoided, though you sure highlight some shady characters hanging around. But I’m glad you (and James Corbett) have finally jumped on the HTTPS train.

    • porkinspolicyreview  On January 22, 2015 at 7:40 pm

      Thanks for the comment and for listening. My apprehension towards using Tor has more to do with people who are not tech savvy. I would include myself in this category as well. If you really know what you are doing you could be fairly anonymous on Tor. My issue is that many of the Tor proponents are pushing it on people that don’t fully understand how to use it. Those people are perhaps even more unsafe on Tor.

      I explored this a little bit more in my full podcast on Tor https://porkinspolicyreview.wordpress.com/2014/08/01/porkins-policy-radio-episode-26-peeling-the-onion-behind-tor-eff-and-john-perry-barlow/

      There is also a lot more on the connections between all these groups and how they tie in with the Snowden story.

      • Roman Scandle  On January 23, 2015 at 5:59 am

        That’s a good point — but I’m not sure the Tor project is the source of this blanket anonymity advocacy. Indeed, some of the reporting you’ve cited is exactly what the Tor people warn you about: that if you reveal your identity in an unencrypted connection, Tor is not going to help. In fact, nothing can help you announcing in the clear who you are.

        I’ve listened to your piece on Tor and JPB, and I’m definitely more skeptical of the EFF than I used to be. My understanding of the situation is a bit different, and filters more through an interagency power struggle, and the CIA picking up the NSA’s COMSEC department, which had been all but abandoned in the wake of collect-’em’-all post-9/11. The spies benefit from anonymity more than us in the short term, but I think we have the advantage in the long game. I also suspect there are TPTB alignments around panopticon vs secrecy-based control New World Ordery systems… possibly with new vs. old money alignments… But I digress…

        Incidentally, Tor + ZRTP is a really good idea. Those two things put together guarantee connection perfect authenticity, good anonymity, and perfect privacy. All of which aren’t worth a damn if your computer is already hacked, of course.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: