Porkins Policy Radio episode 27 The White Female Terrorist

This week I am joined once again by Tom Secker and Jon Ryman for a roundtable discussion about white female terrorists.  We take a look at how white female terrorists have been portrayed in Hollywood movies and TV shows, and examine how these cartoonish representations mimic real life white female terrorists.  We, of course, take a look at one of our favorite white female terrorists, Samantha Lewthwaite, as well as the less known, but equally important, “Jihad Jane.”  We discuss the celebrity status of the white female terrorist in Western society, and how this meme really represents the coming together of several different aspects of the war on terror.  We also speak more broadly about the ever-evolving synthetic War on Terror and how all these  pieces fit together.

Download PPR episode 27

Show notes:

Tom Secker’s websites- Spy Culture, Humanarchy, Investigating the Terror

Jon Ryman’s YouTube channel

Porkins Policy Radio episode 24 Who is Samantha Lewthwaite?

Music:

Joy Division- “Disorder”

Joy Division- “Transmission” (Peel Sessions)

Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Fred J.  On August 16, 2014 at 7:20 pm

    You are on notice – Tom Seckers conspiracy debunking disguised as journalism
    to reinforce the official war on terror Al Queda Bush/Obama “evil doers” script ultimately serves the interests of warmongers (e.g.) you and Toms intentional misinterpretation of Power of Nightmares. Conspiracy debunking and Gatekeeping
    not unlike Chomsky at the CIA front MIT. I exposed you at ICH. Begone bearded Secker, truth teller in disguise, disinfo agent.

    http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=NoamAsset

    • porkinspolicyreview  On August 17, 2014 at 9:28 pm

      I have no idea what podcast you listened to, but I don’t believe it was ours. No where in this podcast did we ever “reinforce the official war on terror Al Queda Bush/Obama ‘evil doers’ script…” I suppose though with people like you it does not matter what we actually said because you most likely did not actually listen to the discussion. Rather than say, provide examples of our alleged misinterpretations, you just call us gatekeepers and disinfo agents. It amazes me that disinfo agents like you throw around terms like disinfo agent against people who speak the truth. So you are on notice as an idiot and a shill. For the record I completely agree with you that Chomsky is a gatekeeper.

  • Fred J.  On August 19, 2014 at 10:21 pm

    Look at Seckers many appearances, investigating the terror show, his “expose on 7/7 reinforces the official story not the false flag it actually was, same with 9/11 Truth – Seckers wishes us to believe there is actually Al Queda independant of US intel, that Bin Laden and middle east arabs did 9/11 rather than the evidence of US military false flag, so too is your emphasis of Syria, Libya a distraction to blame arming Al Queda on Saudis and Gulf stooges rather than on Obama/ the CIA, and the Syria slaughter is entirely a Obama covert pet project, and so too did Tom Secker debunk the evidence of Boston Bombing coverup. His bearded visage looks like one of the many disguised British or American Iraq car bomb “arab” provacteurs used set off terror abroad. Tom Seckers newspeak reeks pf a deep cover agent.Tom is one of these alternative bloggers who supports the carnage and many “surges” like Al Franken, Juan Cole, and Raimondo or these Foundation funded NGO liars like Alex Cockburn, or similar establishment NWO anti- conspiracy hatchet men.

    • porkinspolicyreview  On August 20, 2014 at 12:57 am

      Ok Fred J, or whatever your name is, we are done here. I am not getting sucked into some inane conversation with you. You have already taken up enough of my time, and you will not be getting anymore. You can go and troll someone else. Tell the CIA I said “Hey.”

  • Cu Chulainn  On November 12, 2014 at 4:54 pm

    bye bye Samantha?

    http://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/she-must-have-been-working-for-mi6-surely/

    • porkinspolicyreview  On November 12, 2014 at 4:59 pm

      Not really sure what to make of this story. Again no one seems to be able to explain how she traveled from Syria, where she was training female suicode bombers, all te way to Ukraine. Why would she even go there to fight the Russians? It’s not as if it’s a hotbed for jihadist militants. It is curious that this is the first time that it’s not the UK breaking a story on her. And even more curious that they would let one of their best propaganda tools be taken out. I think we will have to wait and see how this develops.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: